Our latest paper is live! This is the work of our Ph.D. researcher Sahab Zandi, co-supervised by Cristián and María, in collaboration with Christophe Mues, J. C. Moreno-Paredes, at Santander Bank at the time and also Cristián’s Ph.D. classmate, and Kamesh Korangi. This paper is the conclusion of two years of work on our collaboration with Santander Spain, who provided direct access to their database. Our work is, to the best of our knowledge, the first one that measures calculates how risk propagates on small businesses on an individual basis, using advanced deep learning paired with financial behaviour and transactional information.
The Problem We Set Out to Solve
SME lending is challenging to judge from spreadsheets alone. Many small firms don’t have long financial histories, and traditional ratios can miss how trouble moves through supply chains. If a key customer stops paying, cash dries up and loan payments follow – that risk lives in relationships, not just in financial information.
The Idea
We added a “map of relationships” to the usual credit data. One layer captures who pay whom (financial transactions); another captures who share ownership. Together, those multilayer links give a fuller picture of where stress might spread.
How We Built It
We trained models that look at both worlds at once: the tabular records lenders already keep and graph representations of the two networks. A cross-attention fusion step lets each side inform the other before making a call – so the model isn’t blind to either the firm’s own profile or its neighbourhood.
What Changed
Adding the networks made predictions sharper than using standard data alone, with our best cross-attention model on the double-layer graph topping the baselines. We were able to catch more future defaulters, more reliably. We also saw modest gains when we kept the real-world direction and size of money flows, which help the model tell strong ties from weak ones.
What the Links Actually Tell Us
The transaction layer tends to be more informative than common ownership because it reflects live dependencies: who owes you money and how concentrated those receipts are. Firms exposed to defaulted customers (money flowing in from a troubled partner) look riskier than those exposed to defaulted suppliers, an effect that’s stronger when the ties are big and recurring.
Why It Matters
For lenders, network-aware scores flag clusters of correlated risk earlier and support fairer pricing. For SMEs, diversified, healthy counterparties become a credit asset in their own right. More broadly, better risk signals can widen access to finance—especially where traditional histories are thin—while still keeping decisions explainable and auditable.
Read the preprint in this ArXiV link. The paper is still a preprint, so please take it with a grain of salt as it will evolve through the peer-review process. We welcome any feedback!














